When I first predicted a new major world war over a decade ago, I was often labeled pessimistic or even paranoid. However, developments in recent years and the fulfillment of many of my predictions are following a predetermined path that will lead to a global, chaotic conflict.
The Third World War will not be fought in the classic forms—not through military invasions or traditional battles—but as a conflict that will take place within national borders.
In the following, I would like to shed light on the facets of this new war, explain its causes, and point out the consequences for our society. I am able to do this thanks to my years of prophecies and close observation of global developments.
The emergence of the new war
To understand the direction and development of a third world war, it is essential to consider the lessons learned from the two previous world wars. The First and Second World Wars were primarily military conflicts, characterized by institutional armies and clear political agendas. These wars were fought in uniform, across front lines, and against clearly defined opponents.
In contrast to these classic military conflicts, the impending Third World War is not taking the form of armies fighting each other, but rather the complex structures and conflicts developing within our societies. Political ideologies, religious fanaticism, financial hardship, global supply chain bottlenecks, and technological developments are increasingly becoming drivers of global unrest.
Global crises and their effects
The global crises of the last two decades are indicators of a profound upheaval in the world order. Since 2001, with the so-called war on terrorism and the far-reaching consequences of the financial crisis of 2008/2009, which widened the gap between rich and poor in many countries and fueled discontent among broad sections of the population toward the political elites, we have seen the emergence of dissatisfaction. This is the breeding ground for conflicts that will culminate in a struggle for social dominance.
The coronavirus pandemic, which was a planned move to cause global chaos, has destabilized many societies and created rifts between social and political groups. The resulting restrictions and measures have fueled fears and mistrust—not only toward governments, but also within communities themselves.
The geopolitical framework
In addition to internal social conflicts, we are seeing an intensification of military and social conflicts in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, various parts of Africa (North Africa, the Sahel region, South Africa), and parts of South America. These conflicts can be seen as precursors and proxy wars for a global conflict in which the stakes are not only territory, but above all ideologies, beliefs, and technological superiority.
The new warfare
While previous wars were characterized by clearly identifiable enemies, the enemy in World War III is often difficult to identify. The divisions within societies are becoming a defining feature of this conflict. Races, religions, and classes are fighting in a (still) invisible war, with the enemy increasingly to be found in one's own neighborhood or even within one's own family circle.
This redefinition of war leads to a massive loss of trust within communities — mistrust and division replace solidarity and cohesion. At a time when people are more connected than ever through social media, the potential for conflict is further exacerbated by the spread of misinformation and extremism.
The influence of ideologies
In this new war, ideology is the battlefield. Social conflicts take place not only at the political level, but also at the level of values and beliefs. Nationalism, political idealism, racism, and religious extremism are not only social phenomena, but also weapons used against other groups. They are manifestations of a deep-seated imbalance that destabilizes the world order.
The path to subjugation
Given this social division, World War III will serve as a means of subjugating global society. The creation of surveillance mechanisms, justified in the name of security, is another step towards control. In most countries, we are witnessing a tightening of security laws and a restriction of fundamental rights in order to combat perceived threats.
These mechanisms not only promote division, but also prevent the emergence of collective resistance to these developments. The feeling of powerlessness that prevails among many populations leads many people to resign themselves to their oppression and lose hope for change.
The role of the elites
The role of social and political elites is crucial to understanding this new war. These groups often pursue their own interests, which do not coincide with the welfare of the general population. They promote narratives that secure their positions of power and maintain the status quo.
In view of these dynamics, it becomes clear that the Third World War is not only a conflict between the masses, but also a power game played by the elites. Within this framework, there are numerous actors who attempt to control and steer societies in order to gain advantages for themselves.
The goals of the war
The ultimate goal of such a conflict is to subjugate and control the human family. Targeted disinformation, media manipulation, and the creation of enemy stereotypes foster a climate of fear and mistrust. The population is paralyzed in its decision-making power and less inclined to rebel against the elites.
Much blood will be shed – Europe, the epicenter of World War III
How bloody and violent World War III will be depends largely on the reaction of the populations. The more easily they adapt to the new ruling power, the less violence will be necessary on the part of the authorities against their own people.
Regardless of this, I see Europe as the epicenter of this new world war. Not because Europe has many natural resources or intellectual values worth fighting for, but because it will be divided and torn apart among the world powers. On European soil, battles will be fought for the supremacy of individual regions and economic interests. Europe is like an animal being led to the slaughterhouse. Proxy conflicts in Europe will increase, similar to those we have already seen in Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, the Far East, and South and Central America.
While autocratic political systems have already been introduced in most parts of the world, Europe is still resisting and trying to defend its liberal democracy. As I explained in my last article for this magazine, the US is a current example of a country turning away from the principle of liberal democracy. The elite has recognized that this system is unsustainable and offers no successful future.
While the drums of war are growing louder in Europe, many other regions have already left the major power conflicts behind and are living in the new world order. In other words, Europe could prevent a bloody conflict on its soil if it recognized that its political system has had its day and that a new ideology awaits it.
